You’ll be in contempt if you transmit anti-LGBTQI bill to the President – Lawyer for Richard Sky tells Speaker



Advertisement


Lawyer
for
broadcast
Journalist
Richard
Sky
who
has
filed
a
case
against
a
move
to
transmit
the
anti-lgbtqi
bill
to
the
president
for
assent, 
Paa
Kwasi
Abaidoo,
has
told
the
speaker
of
Parliament
Alban
Bagbin
that
he
will
flout
the
law
on
contempt
if
he
attempts
to
transmit
the
bill
to
the
president
while
the
case
is
still
pending
in
court.

His
comments
come
after
the
Supreme
Court
on
Wednesday,
July
17
deferred
the
ruling
on
the
request
to
restrain
Parliament
from
transmitting
the
Anti-LGBT
bill
filed
by
Dr.
Amanda
Odoi,
until
the
substantive
case
is
heard
and
determined.

The
5-member
panel,
chaired
by
Chief
Justice,
Gertrude
Torkornoo
adjourned
the
case
indefinitely,
TV3’s
Joseph
Ackah-Blay
who
was
in
court
reported.

The
same
conclusion
was
given
to
the
application
filed
by
Richard
Sky
against
the
anti-lgbti
bill,
as
well.

Speaking
to
journalists
after
the
court
proceedings,
Abadioo
said
“By
law
when
the
application
is
before
the
court
and
it
has
not
been
determined
yet,
although
it
has
not
been
expressly
been
stated
or
granted
or
not
granted,
once
it
is
pending
you
don’t
do
anything
to
prejudice
the
outcome
of
the
application.
So
we
say
that
invariably
or
indirectly
it
is
still
restraining
any
party
from
from
doing
anything
contrary
to
the
demands
of
the
application.”

Asked
whether,
for
clarity,
they
do
not
expect
parliament
to
transmit
the
bill,
he
said
“No
they
can’t
do
it
so
far
as
this
matter
is
spending
otherwise
it
will
amount
to
contempt
of
court
to
the
best
of
our
understanding
of
the
law.”


Background

There
are
currently
two
lawsuits
before
the
Supreme
Court
challenging
the
passage
of
the
anti-LGBTQ+
bill
passed
by
Parliament.

Richard
Dela
Sky
is
challenging
the
constitutionality
of
Parliament’s
passage
of
the
“Human
Sexual
Rights
and
Family
Values
Bill.”

He
argues
that
the
bill
violates
several
provisions
of
the
1992
Constitution,
including
Article
33(5)
and
Articles
12(1)
and
(2),
15(1),
17(1)
and
(2),
18(2),
and
21(1)(a)(b)(d)
and
(e).

Sky
is
seeking
eight
reliefs,
including
an
order
declaring
that
the
Speaker
of
Parliament
contravened
Article
108(a)(ii)
of
the
Constitution
by
allowing
Parliament
to
pass
the
bill,
which
imposes
a
charge
on
the
Consolidated
Fund
or
other
public
funds
of
Ghana.

Dr.
Amanda
Odoi
has
raised
concerns
about
specific
provisions
within
the
Human
Sexual
Rights
and
Family
Values
Bill.

She
is
seeking
a
restraining
order
to
prevent
the
Speaker,
the
Attorney-General,
and
the
Clerk
of
Parliament
from
sending
the
bill
to
President
Akufo-Addo
for
approval.